NOTES ON THE PIGMIES ISLE,
AT THE BUTT OF LEWIS, WITH RESULTS OF THE RECENI EXPLORATION OF THE
"PIGMIES CHAPEL" THERE. By WILLIAM COOK MACKENZIE, F.S.A. SCOT.
The first traveller, so far as I
have ascertained, who wrote about the Pigniies Isle was Dean Monro, who,
in his pastoral capacity, visited Lewis about 1549. I shall quote his
description in full, in modern English.
"Atthe north point of Lewis," he says,
"there is a little isle called the Pigmies Isle, with a little kirk in it
of their own handiwork. Within this kirk the ancients of that country of
the Lewis say that the said pigmies have been buried there. Many men of
different countries have delved deeply the floor of the little kirk, and I
myself among the rest, and have found in it, deep under the earth, certain
bones and round heads of wonderful little size, alleged to be the bones of
the said pigmies; which may be likely, according to sundry histories that
we read of the pigmies; but I leave this far to the ancients of Lewis."
George Buchanan, in his History
of Scotland, quotes the Deans statement with apparent conviction.
An official account of Lewis, drawn
up about 1580, refers to the little kirk and the pigmies bones, which, it
says, on being measured, proved to be not quite two inches long.
The most circumstantial account of
the isle is given by a Captain Dymes, who visited Lewis in 1630. He, too,
had dug up some bones, but he quaintly remarks: "My belief is scarce big
enough to think them to be human bones."
Lewisman named John Morison, who wrote an account of his native island
about 1680, mentions the isle and the bones, but scoffs at the pigmy
theory, believing the bones to be those of "small fowls."
In his well-known description of the
Western Isles at the end of the seventeenth century, Martin tells us of
the small bones which had been dug up. "This," he adds, "gave ground to a
tradition which the natives have, of a very low-statured people living
once here, called Lusbirdan or pigmies."
" Lusbirdan " is clearly the modern
Luspardan, which, both in Gaelic and Scots, stands for "pigmy." Dr
MacBain is probably right in deriving it from Lugh-spiorad, or
little spirit, though Jamieson gives other and more fanciful derivations.
In Blaeus map, the name of
the isle appears as Ylen Dunibeg,
orIsland of the
Little Men. In a rough sketch of Lewis drawn by Captain Dymes, it appears
as the "Isle of Pigmies," which name is also given to it by Martin, though
he states that the natives (like Blaeu) called it the "Island of Little
Men," a distinction with a difference. In the Ordnance Survey map of the
present day, it appears as "Luchruban," which is plainly identical with
Luchorpain, or Luchrupain, the diminutive people of Irish
legend; and the full name was probably Eilean na Luchrupáin, or
Island of the Luchrupain, the dwarfs who were complementary to the Irish
Fomhoraiqh (Fomorians) or giants. It is impossible to say when this
name supplanted that of the Pigmies Isle, but not improbably it was given
to the isle by Irish antiquaries, who thought they had discovered in the
small bone; relics of their legendary Luchrupdin. Captain Dymes
states that the bones had often been dug up, especially by the Irish who
came to Ness for that purpose. The context seems to show that he meant
natives of Ireland, and not merely Gaelic-speakers.
It may be observed that the latest
contemporary notice of the Pigmies Isle appearsof all placesin an ode.
Collins was evidently a firm believer in the pigmy theory, and in his
Ode on the Popular Superstitions of the Highlands, published in 1749,
the little islet at Ness, with its accepted tradition, receives honourable
Early in the nineteenth century, the
voice of the sceptic was heard in the land. Dr John MCulloch roundly
denied the very existence of the isle, and, moreover, based an unworthy
attack on Dean Monros veracity, generally, upon his account of it. I find
MCullochs aspersion on Buchanans "pious and well-informed man"
reproduced in a popular handbook to the "Highlands and Islands," published
in 1877; so it is obvious that the Deans reputation for veracity has
suffered most undeservedly by M'Cullochs ill-considered attack.
If for no other reason than that of
restoring Dean Monros character as a reliable writer, I am glad to have
re-discovered the Pigmies Isle. I found it chiefly by means of Captain
Dymess description in a manuscript I lighted upon, when searching for
material for my history of the Outer Hebrides. I had no opportunity
at the time of making further investigations, but my brother, Mr C. G.
Mackenzie, and my cousin, Dr Mackenzie, both of Stornoway, subsequently
made an exhaustive search in the so-called chapel, and with some tangible
Dr Mackenzie has prepared a
statement of their discoveries, from which I extract the salient features.
The finds were disappointing, being
confined to some pieces of hand-made and
unglazed pottery, a number of bones, and a small quantity of peat-ash. But
the structure itself is of a distinctly interesting type.
The isle lies to the
north-west of the lighthouse at the Butt of Lewis. It has an extreme
length of about 80 feet and an extreme breadth of about 70 feet, and is
completely isolated from the mainland of Lewis only during very high
tides. The surface is covered with short sea-grass. The greenness of the
grass and the peculiar rounded shape of the isle make it a conspicuous
feature of the landscape. The visible portion of the structure which was
explored stands at the end contiguous to the mainland. The long axis of
the building runs almost due east and west. "Of the building itself," says
Dr Mackenzie, "I found only the oblong portion, partially exposed to view.
The walls of this portion are composed of flat and neatly-laid stones,
unmortared. They are 2 feet in thickness, and stand from their foundations
at a general height of 2 feet. About the middle of the south wall, there
is a shallow opening, 18 inches wide, forming part of the two sides and
bottom of a square. It appears to have been used as a window. Its sill is
18 inches from the foundation line of the walls."
This is the portion of the building
known to Dean Monro and the other writers whose descriptions have been
quoted. The modern investigators followed their example by digging up the
floor of the so-called kirk, and between the upper layer of loam and the
lower of sea-sand, they found the bones and the patterned pottery. It
consists of one piece of the bottom, with part of the side, of a small
vessel of reddish clay, not made on the wheel or fired in a kiln, and
unglazed; three portions apparently of the sides of different vessels of
dark micaceous clay, about 1/4 inch in thickness, somewhat resembling the
old craggans, and ornamented with rough parallel scratches, as if drawn
with the broken end of a twig; and a fourth fragment, showing the
lip of a larger vessel, elegantly shaped, well smoothed on the inside, and
the outside ornamented with the same linear striation. The loam at both
ends of the layer was impregnated with a reddish material, resembling damp
The part of the structure which was
laid bare for the first time is described by Dr Mackenzie in detail, the
gist of his statement being as follows
: From the so-called kirk, a passage, 21
inches wide, leads due west for a
distance of 6 1/2 feet. Its walls, dry-built and plumb, are 2 feet in
height. There are two interruptions in the wall, one on its south side,
where it should have abutted on the west end of the chapel, and the other
on the opposite side. The former, which has a width of 27 inches, appears
to have been the doorway of the structure. The niche on the north side is
semicircular in shape; it has a breadth of 41 inches and an extreme depth
of 30 inches. Its floor of carefully laid flat stones is about 9 inches
above the general level of the passage floor. The roof of this recess
appears to have been semicircular in shape.
At its western extremity, the
passage opens into a roofless circular apartment about 10 feet in
diameter. Its walls are very well built of dry-stone; they rise from their
foundations to a height of about 4 feet. At the west of the chamber
peat-ash was found, and under the floor some more of the small bones.
In the wall of this chamber is a
small square recess, 17 inches high, 15 inches broad, and 19 inches deep.
The interior long axis of the entire
structure (comprising the circular chamber, the passage, and the kirk)
measures 24 feet 9 inches. The floor of the whole slopes from its western
to its eastern extremity, the gradient being about 1 in 50.
A remarkable feature of the circular
apartment and the passage is the drainage system, of which evidences
remain. A carefully-built drain, composed of flat stones laid in a "V"
shape, enters under the foundations where marked on the plan. From this
point, it runs in front of the fire-place in the circular chamber where
the ashes were found, and curving gently, courses under the full width of
the floor through the passage. Opposite the niche in the passage, it is
joined by another drain of the same construction, which emerges from the
floor of the niche. From this junction, it passes to the outside through
the doorway, not apparently having entered the kirk at all.
The contents of the draina
pultaceous dark-coloured deposit were freely dotted with a pure white
substance, resembling chloride of lime.
The whole structure is surrounded by
what appears to have been an old turf-grown stone dyke, the diameter of
the enclosure measuring, roughly, 40 feet. This dyke impinges upon the
building at its west end, is close to it and the edge of the cliff on the
south and east, and is furthest from it on the north-west.
Dr Mackenzie believes that the
character of the whole structure has been for the first time revealed by
the excavations above described, and that the roofs of the chambers and
the passage between them, of which no part now remains, were probably
similar to those of certain archaic buildings which he saw on Eilean Môr
in the Flannan Isles in 1896, the latter consisting of large slabs of
stone forming a beehive dome, with a circular hole at or near the apex,
while the passages were lintelled over with flat slabs. The further
suggestion is made that the roofs of the Luchruban chambers were probably
turfed, in order to afford additional security, and, possibly, more
I believe I am right in affirming
that no exact counterpart of the Luchruban structure is known, though its
general plan would appear to warrant its classification with other
buildings of a primitive type found elsewhere in the Hebrides. A
difficulty, however, arises in the persistence with which the oblong
chamberthe only portion of the building known to previous investigators
is designated in past accounts as a "kirk" or "chapel." Moreover, it will
be remembered that Dean Monro declared it was the handiwork of the pigmies
themselves. Probably the chamber is too small to have been used at any
time as a chapel, though it may conceivably have been utilised as the
oratory of a hermit, who made the circular chamber his dwelling. The two
chambers are too similar in construction, except in forth, to warrant the
assumption that the smaller one was added to the other at a later period.
The structure, as it appears to-day, was clearly the original plan,
whoever the designers may have been. Dr Mackenzie states that the chapel
on Eilean Mor stands apart from the beehive buildings, but its plan is the
same, its wall structure similar, and its interior dimensions somewhat
less than those of the so-called Pigmies Chapel.
The local tradition at the present
day connects a saint named Frangusa name suggesting French nationality,
and not to be looked for in the Roman calendarwith the pigmies of
Luchruban. St Frangus is said to have been an outlaw who lived on the
sands of Lionel at Ness. According to the tradition, which was recently
taken down from the lips of an old resident of Ness, Frangus was unkind to
the pigmies, who hanged him on a hill, which is called Bruich Frangus
to this day. It is conceivable that this Saint Frangus may have used
the structure at Luchruban as a place of retreat, thus accounting for the
smaller chamber being known as a "chapel." But the most likely explanation
is, that it was popularly known by that name, owing to its resemblance to
the remains of chapels or oratories which were known to exist on other
islets along the coast of Lewis.
The tradition now current in Ness
about the pigmies themselves is not without interest. They are said to
have been "Spaniards," who came to Lewis 500 years B.C. In the year 1 A.D.
"big yellow men" came from Argyll and drove the little men from Cunndal (a
cove near Luchruban) to the latter island; but when the pigmies got
numerous, they emigrated to Europie and Knockaird in the same vicinity.
They lived on "buffaloes," which they killed by throwing "sharp-pointed
knives at them." Here we apparently have the story of the small dark
aborigines invaded by the Goidels or Early Celts, tradition thus tallying
with the results of modern ethnological research. At Cunndal I discovered
some twenty-five or more hut-circles, with stone foundations in, I think,
one instance only, the others being simply mounds of turf. I could obtain
no information in the district about them, except that they had been used
for storing sea-weed and for fish-curing purposes. But further inquiry
elicited the fact that they had existed "from time immemorial," and,
according to the old Ness man, they had formed the dwellings of his
pigmies previous to their migration to Luchruban.
The question naturally suggests
itself: Did the pigmy story take its rise from the discovery of the small
bones at Luchruban, or was it a current tradition before that discovery?
John Morison and Martin seem to suggest the former theory; but Dean Monro,
the earliest narrator, appears to hold the contrary view; while the
tradition of the present day supports the assumption that the pigmy legend
is entirely independent of the bone discoveries.
Any lingering notion that the bones
recently found may have been wholly or partly human, has been completely
dispelled by expert examination. I sent them to the Natural History Museum
at South Kensington, to secure an authoritative pronouncement by a
comparative anatomist. They were examined by Dr Charles W. Andrews, who
has kindly classified them in detail. Of fourteen different specimens
submitted to him, he pronounced seven to be the bones of mammals and seven
those of birds. The mammals comprise oxen, young lambs, sheep, and a dog
(or a fox); the birds represented are the rock pigeon, the razorbill, the
greater and the lesser black-backed gull, and (?) a petrel, the bone
pertaining to the last-named being a portion of a mandible, difficult of
It is quite obvious that the mammals
and birds formed the diet of the dwellers in the subterranean chambers.
With the exception of the ox, they are all indigenous to the district, and
even at the present day the gull is largely used for human food at Ness.
It is perhaps beyond the scope of
this paper to discuss in detail the value of the pigmy legend, as hearing
upon the origin of the remarkable structure at Luchruban. That the
tradition about the pigmies has its roots in ethnological facts is, I
think, a demonstrable proposition. Allowance must be made for the
exaggeration of tradition, which measures its low-statured peoples by
inches, just as it measures its tall peoples by yards. Hence we have
pigmies and giants to represent races who were shorter or taller than the
race perpetuating the traditions.
It is fairly obvious that the
pigmies of Luchruban were simply a prehistoric people of short stature and
dark hair, who were contemptuously called Danibeg or "little men"
by their successors, a name which was inaccurately Englished and
perpetuated as "pigmies." Naturally, the discovery of the small bones
would give a tremendous fillip to the pigmy idea, and so the error
persisted owing to the ignorance of comparative anatomy which prevailed.
It is at least satisfactory to have given this myth a final burial.
The Island of Lewis offers a
remarkably rich field of investigation to the ethnologist, in view of the
marked diversity of its types. Dr Beddoe, whose authority will be
acknowledged, suggested that one of these types) "a short, thick-set,
snub-nosed, dark-haired, and even dark-eyed race," was probably
aboriginal, and possibly Finnish. Have we here the descendants of the
so-called pigmies? The Laplanders or true Finns have certainly some
physical affinities with the short and dark type of Lewisman (a type which
is but sparsely represented in the island); while the qammar or
huts of the Lapps, as described by travellers, bear a resemblance to the
Luchruban structure, as it must have been originally designed. Customs
lingered in Lewis as recently as the eighteenth, or even the nineteenth
century, which have elsewhere been regarded as peculiar to Lapland. And
Professor Sven Nilssen shows convincingly, as I think, that the pigmies of
tradition and the dwarfs of the Sagas belonged to the same race as the
Laplanders of the present day. Moreover, the well-authenticated traditions
in Shetland about the Finn-men apparently offer corroboration of the view
that the "little men" of these islands were of Finnish or Lapponic origin.
The Firbolg, the short dark men of Irish tradition, who were driven from
Ireland to the Hebrides by the Tuatha de Danaan, represent, not
improbably, the same race. Dun Fhirbolg in St Kilda may be of some
It is a noteworthy fact that while
Highland folk-lore is full of the Famhuirean (the Irish Fomorians)
or giants, there is a curious absence of the complementary Luchrupain
or dwarfs. How is this to be accounted for? May it not be that they
are represented by our old friends, the fairies, who, by the way, are
sometimes called Daoine Beaqa, the ancient name of the Pigmies
It is impossible to elaborate this
suggestion here, but I may mention one fact concerning the Lewis fairies.
One of their names is Muinntir Fionnlagh, translated as the Finlay
people, a title which, as applied to fairies, has baffled Lewis folk-lorists.
I venture to suggest that this name means "the little Finn people," and
that it links the Finnish aborigines with the "good little people" of
fairy lore who dwell in the bowels of green hills like Luchruhan, and
practise uncanny arts like the Lapp wizards.
This comment system requires
you to be logged in through either a Disqus account or an
account you already have with Google, Twitter, Facebook or
Yahoo. In the event you don't have an account with any of these
companies then you can create an account with Disqus. All
comments are moderated so they won't display until the moderator
has approved your comment.