|
What a
beautiful world we are privileged to live in. What lovely diverse
peoples we share this planet with. It would be truly wonderful if we
could live together in harmony, and cooperate in building peaceful and
sustainable societies and systems. Surely no amount of national or
ethnic pride, or greed for an ever-larger share of trade and resources,
could justify our abuse of each other, or our determination to enforce
our way of life on other peoples.


Two impressive scenes from our beautiful world
It is also
a troubled world, and there are no end of issues with the potential to
alienate nations and governments, or to feed the military monsters’
appetites for war and destruction. If in six millenniums of human
history we have not yet learned how to resolve disputes without recourse
to murder on a massive scale, there is little hope for us. Our
mechanisms and avenues of diplomacy (like the UN) may well be very
imperfect and often yield limited results, - but still they are
preferable to unleashing Armageddon on the world.
The past 67
years of my life have seen the rise and fall of many ideologies and
philosophies. Some took a while to be discredited, and some withered
quickly, only to reappear in a different guise. I daresay it was ever
thus. Solomon declared that “there is nothing new under the sun”. A
wise old Irish Jesuit priest who laboured all his life in Africa, used
to tell me that the real issues and questions of life were not modern at
all, and modern learning had little to add on these subjects. The
ancient virtues were still valid, and the deadly sins recognized by
sages and saints of old, were still around us today.
Communism
appeared to be on the rise for the first half of my life. Many of the
socialists in my family and community viewed it with respect, and valued
it as a counterweight to the excesses of capitalism. But while it
appeared to be based on altruistic humanistic values, it was inherently
cruel, ruthless, unprincipled and despotic, - certainly from all we have
learned about its implementation in the Soviet Union, China, North
Korea, Cambodia and Albania. The writings of numerous dissidents like
Alexander Solzhenitsyn and the prophetic parable by George Orwell,
Animal Farm, confirmed what totalitarian Marxism was really like.

Communism
promised much but mainly delivered injustice and oppression
Now, even
former committed socialists admit, - “all the world’s socialist
systems have failed”. There is not a single successful example of a
thriving socialist economy. I guess the nearest there is must be poor
little maligned, beleaguered, and persecuted Cuba. The formidable
economies of the USSR and Eastern Europe have all succumbed to modern
pressures and turned to free enterprise. Even the immense land of
China, though still nominally communist, has become a thriving free
market economy. Unlike Russia, it has somehow been able to do this
gradually, without dismantling State apparatus or causing the upheavals
and extremes that have afflicted the former Soviet Union.
Right wing
capitalism, and its children, - multi-national corporations, globalism,
and the supremacy of market forces and profits above all other human and
ecological values, is presently triumphant and on the ascent. But it
also contains within itself the seeds of its own destruction, as lucidly
forecast by Schumacher over thirty years ago. How many unnecessary wars
and how much bloodshed and oppression has occurred the past 50 years to
extend the tentacles of global business? And how much environmental
damage is perpetrated, and human misery increased by big business’s
attempts to maximize profits without regard to the sustainability of
life on planet earth?

Bombers
delivering death and destruction from the air
The
Christian church, - or much of it, has been influenced, and at times,
deceived or seduced by these movements over the years. At the beginning
of the 20th century, some saw socialism and communism as
harbingers of the kingdom of God on earth. Some today see capitalist
forces as essentially God-ordained and Biblical. They should take a
hard look at the corruption and exploitation of humankind by the
multi-nationals, and compare that with the vision of “Babylon the great”
in the book of Revelation, and her control of wealth and trade. They
also need to measure their attitudes to money and business against the
words and example of Christ. The “Liberation Theology” of Latin
America, was a reaction to economic slavery of the people being robbed
of access to their God-given resources. The church should suffer with
suffering people, and seek to defend them, - but not to resort to an
armed response.

Habitat for
Humanity and Christian groups working in a Delhi slum
I see
several major failings in the church, the world over, as we enter the 21st
century. We were warned very clearly about each by Christ Himself. The
first is worldliness and the pursuit of wealth and comfort as our
primary goal. The second is sheer hardness of heart, loveless-ness, and
lack of compassion. A third is seduction by the siren voices and false
prophets of the political and sensual worlds. And a fourth is shallow
emotionalism that does not take Christ’s words seriously, and is devoid
of genuine reverence for God. Sadly, the church deserves the criticism
it receives from outside, for its failures in these areas.


Wealthy
churches and their fund-raising by television appear to be very far in
spirit
and in practice from the life and message of Jesus
Thankfully, however, there are millions of humble believers throughout
the world (China alone is believed to have over 50 million in its small
independent house-churches). Other tens of millions exist in Russia,
south Asia, Africa, and south America. These ordinary Christians,
uncontaminated by wealth or politics, are to my mind, the true followers
of the Man of Nazareth and Galilee. Unheralded and often unnoticed,
they are indeed the salt of the earth, exercising a silent but vital
influence on society, preserving it from corruption, and adding a unique
flavour to life. Critics of religion may mock their simple faith, but
it empowers them to live in hope over impossible odds of injustice,
poverty, hardship, disease and the many uncertainties they face. And in
case any reader thinks I disparage people of other faiths, - far from
it. I have found similar strengths and virtues exhibited by followers
of Islam, Buddhism, and animist beliefs. God is no respecter of
persons, and His ear is open to all, despite our cultural backgrounds,
misconceptions, or limited understanding. As one young Moslem woman
said to me in south-west Thailand after enquiring about my own faith,
“Is it not wonderful that we both have faith in God, and is that not a
precious thing to carry with you through life”.
Twentieth
century materialism was in truth a tool of both communist and capitalist
forces. Each offered bread and circuses, and imagined security in
different forms. Governments use prospects of access to material things
to win and maintain their people’s loyalty. Mrs Thatcher did it
brilliantly, as did Ronald Reagan. Her success said as much about the
character of the English as it did about her political acumen. The
elevation of human greed to the status of a virtue to justify right wing
economics, is combined in modern administrations with sophisticated
methods of maintaining political control. Keep the people occupied with
the fruits of monetary advances, and get them to believe they would be
at risk if the government was to change. Make fictitious enemies of
those whose needs challenge our indulgence. Call them lazy, welfare
scroungers, and illegal immigrants or asylum seekers. You are not your
brother’s keeper. The poor are to blame for their own predicament.
Control the media and the message. Utilise a government-speak language
to confuse and obfuscate.
Our
military spokespersons are expert at using politically-correct language
that obscures the horrific nature of their operations. While they rain
bombs and shells on civilians, killing and maiming children, women, old
people without distinction, in an attempt to destroy an insurgency, the
generals talk blandly of getting the job done, dealing with the problem,
and finishing the assignment. Never will you hear a word from them
about the human carnage of the mayhem they cause. And often when they
have no idea how many people were blown to pieces, or who these persons
were, they will callously claim to have dealt with suspected insurgents,
or destroyed ‘the enemy’.

Cluster bomb victim, Iraq. Nato
bombing victim in Afghanistan.
The writer is very aware of the carnage also caused by the other
side in those conflicts, but we need to see that we also are guilty
of murder and maiming of the innocent
What Thatcher pioneered,
in her brazen attempt to encourage naked greed in business, and to
belittle a social conscience, Blair applied unashamedly and with greater
contempt for the electorate. Idealism was discarded for the pursuit of
power regardless. As a young New Labour executive disclosed to a
Scottish reporter, with remarkable arrogance, “You know nothing about
politics. You actually think it is about policies and programmes and
values. It is nothing of the sort. It is about control of the tabloid
press,- period.” Bernard Ingham [Origins
of the Obsession, in The Wages of Spin, by Bernard Ingham,
John Murray, London, 2003]
quotes Tony Blair declaring “You have got to understand that the only
thing that matters in this campaign is the media. The media, the media
and the media”. And that statement of New Labour strategy was made
before Blair became leader, in fact, just three days after the death of
Labour leader John Smith.
The “New
Age” movement has flourished in this spiritual vacuum. It encompasses a
range of superstitions and genuine ideals. The negative side is replete
with taro cards, ouija boards, séances, horoscopes, and psychedelic
drugs. The idealistic side of New Age is concerned with the
environment, human wholeness, peace and simplicity. I have a soft spot
for that side of the movement. To be honest I think they are nearer the
kingdom of God than are the atheistic materialists. There is a mixed
community of ‘new-agers’ at Findhorn near my home. They include, nature
lovers, pacifists, natural health practitioners, agnostics, Christians
with a concern for society and the environment, and some adherents of
pagan beliefs. They are all sincere searchers, and I hope I don’t insult
them when I say that the latter sub-group sometimes seem to me like a
number of wise men from the east who started out following the Nativity
star, but who over-shot Bethlehem and went on to Stonehenge!

At Iona
1981 when participating in a conference on third world development
and the role of multi-nationals
The “Green”
movement in its various forms has grown to challenge the ruthless
over-exploitation of natural resources, and the insane destruction and
degradation of our environment that provides us with air, water, food,
renewable energy and raw materials. The rise of green political parties
is a modest but welcome counterbalance to unbridled capitalism. But
some of them are less than purely green, and have other agendas that are
disturbing, extreme, or weird to say the least. Some have been hijacked
by groups that want to dictate what is taught or not taught in our
schools, and what politically correct behaviour should be. Others
appear to be more intent on promoting aggressive hedonism and deviance,
than protecting the environment. Some green movements like WWF, have
gotten together with large food corporations that have monopolistic
goals, however much they may claim to be in favour of organic foods.
There is
also an imbalance in the issues they target. This may stem from
calculations that certain ones can be used to milk the public for
financial and emotional support, while others may not. Battery farming
of egg-laying hens are an example. We hear little protest from the
green movement to halt that cruel industry. Instead they focus on
protecting a seal population that grown beyond the carrying capacity of
coastal waters to maintain, with the result that they now attack fish
farms, and venture far to sea to seek alternative fish stocks. British
organizations like RSPB and quangos like Scottish Natural Heritage, have
acquired dictatorial powers over rural communities which they exert with
a callous disdain for the people who have lived there for generations.
In this they bring the whole green movement into disrepute.
We have
read plenty silly statements by the extreme green wing, that appear to
imply the earth would be fine if only there were no human beings around
to harvest its produce ! I have listened (in overseas aid meetings in
Whitehall), to WWF officials warn ignorantly against over-fishing in
artisanal low-effort fisheries, and assert that the fishers would
destroy the coastal mangrove forests by building too many boats! (For
those unfamiliar with mangrove trees, it is quite impossible to build a
boat from such thin twisted branches). A farmer in the Hebrides asked
for permission to erect a wind generator on his land which was not
served by the local electricity grid. RSPB objected and the farmer was
obliged to finance an independent study on the presence of golden eagles
in that area. The study concluded that such birds had never been seen
or recorded there. This thought the farmer, was the end of the matter.
But no! RSPB then insisted he finance a further independent study to
assess the chances that an eagle might stray into the area in the
future.
Manipulation by the bigger ‘green’ organizations has sullied the whole
environmental movement and cast aspersions on some of its aims and
assertions. One cannot help feeling that this has been brought about
partly to weaken support for serious action. Inconsistencies in the
policies and programmes of some groups smack of hypocrisy or of a
callous preference for interventions that will raise money or increase
political support, rather than make a genuine change for good. I
mentioned the greens’ determination to oppose a cull on mushrooming
populations of seals, while at the same time ignoring the plight of
battery farm hens or the miserable short existence of veal calves. The
British Parliament spent hundreds of hours debating fox hunting, and the
police are wasting precious resources on seeking to enforce the hunting
ban.

This is how we treat the birds who supply us
with eggs,
and the cows from which we get tender veal meat.
This
excessive response stands in sharp contrast to the minimal time given to
debating the war in Iraq that led to the deaths of up to 700,000
innocent Iraqis as collateral damage, or as an indirect result of the
conflict. I am against the hunting of foxes, or any other wild game for
that matter. But one wonders whether those who cry loudest have ever
been to a slaughterhouse, or seen just how animals are killed and
butchered to put food on our plates. And how many of them worry about
the inhuman treatment of refugees, or the heartless murder of tens of
thousands of innocent victims of our wars?
Global
environmental challenges, however, are finally being taken seriously and
we may yet avert the worst of the impending damage. The reluctance of
governments to act in these areas relates to the size of the investments
required, the fundamental changes need in some policies, and the nature
of elected governments that rarely think beyond their five year
horizons. It has been said that governments will do the sane rational
thing only after they have exhausted all other alternatives. This
appears to be coming true in respect of the ozone layer erosion, nuclear
power, genetic modifications of crops, control of pollution of soil and
water, and support for reforestation and organic foods. Dinosaurs can
turn, and even the most closed mind can eventually see sense. I believe
the task ahead of humanity for the next century, if the world continues,
should include :
-
A huge
shift in resources from armaments to poverty alleviation and
husbanding of all of earth’s natural resources
-
Conservation and protection of global supplies of fresh water
-
Conservation, protection and regeneration of forests and woodlands
-
Development of renewable fuels and sustainable energy systems to
replace the fossil fuels, petroleum and coal.
-
Reversal of current pollution of air, soils, rivers and seas, by
chemicals, CO2 emissions, urban and industrial waste
-
Development of national and global systems of full employment
-
Control
of mental and social pollutants from internet and media
-
Encouragement of people empowerment at grass roots levels, including
more and more transparency in government, instead of increased
secrecy and misinformation on matters that concern all citizens.
|
Family Life
Before discussing these
measures to address global issues, we might do well to consider
the breakdown in family life and its effect on the fragmentation
of society and on human behaviour in general. The family is the
basic unit of society and it is within the family we learn
loyalty and discipline, cooperation and sharing. There also we
experience love and encouragement, and imbibe wisdom and
values. We have shoulders to cry on and older heads to consult
for guidance. And we older ones have wonderful children and
grandchildren to inject some fun into our dull lives!
We look at past attempts
to destroy the family unit – mainly in extreme Marxist regimes,
and we see the horrible results in cases like the Khmer Rouge
rule in Cambodia’s five years of wicked despotism. It is
wonderful to see that the family survived that in Cambodia, -
but one is sickened by indications of deep malaise in family
relationship in the cultured west. In Britain we are regularly
shocked by appalling incidents of abuse of children – by members
of their own families. America suffers from incomprehensibly
high rates of absentee fathers, - men who sire children then
abandon them and their mothers. This serious phenomenon among
Negro communities has been denounced by a range of black
leaders, Christian, black Moslem, and secular.
Generally speaking family
cohesion remains strong in Asia and the Far East, and perhaps to
a lesser extent in Africa where survival instincts are more to
the fore. In Britain, it often appears that political
correctness promotes ideas and concepts that are designed to
weaken respect for parents and parental controls. In matters
such as sex education in schools, surely the mothers ought to
have a veto on some of the things lobby groups want us to teach
to innocent kids who are easy prey to deviant propaganda. And
before someone blames parents for high rates of teenage
pregnancy, - we should take a look at societies where the family
is strong, - such as in Asia and Arabia, (and where there is
little public sex education), - and explain why teenage
pregnancy is so uncommon there.
I can only express
gratitude for my own upbringing in a family and a community that
were old-fashioned enough to preserve traditional wisdom, and
practical enough in their recognition of the need for discipline
as well as nurture. Then I was blessed with a wonderful wife
and six marvelous children, and their spouses, and now with
eight grandchildren and more on their way. All have been an
inestimable blessing and inspiration. Of course, I hasten to
add, each of us is far from perfect, and we have had to face the
many issues and disappointments that confront any family in
these modern times. But that is life. And it is how we work
through the problems and difficulties rather than the issues
themselves that determine whether we stay together and become
stronger as a family, or fragment and drift apart.
Surely one of the most
valuable investments we can make in life is our investment of
time and affection, listening and doing things together, with
our children. Far more than what we actually teach them, our
children learn by our behaviour, our respect for each other, and
how we treat our partners and our neighbours.

My long-suffering wife,
Margo

Myself with Margo

The family together for
our son’s wedding |

Orphans in
Cambodia
The
overwhelming need must be to tackle human misery and poverty in all its
forms. As I write this, and as you read it, millions of people are
somehow surviving in the horrid shanty towns and slums of Lagos,
Nairobi, Calcutta, Mumbai, Rio De Janiero, Lima, Jakarta, Manila, and
numerous other mega-cities. The shocking aspect to those dens of misery,
injustice and human degradation, - is that they exist side by side with
affluence, luxury, and lavish indulgence. Those responsible for
governance and the public purse in such places, mostly compound the
problems and prevent alleviation, by their corrupt practices. Darfur is
a blot on the conscience of the world, as are the millions of
undernourished people, the millions of displaced persons, and the
victims of preventable disease.

Human
beings live their lives in this Mumbia slum

Habitat
homes for victims of the Katrina storm in New Orleans.
Having
worked all my life on aid programmes of different sorts; with all their
limitations and imperfections, it has been galling to witness the
obscene amounts spent on wars and weapons and military forces, compared
to the modest sums that are allocated for aid. Money alone would not
end the causes of poverty which as Jesus said, will always be with us.
But money could help substantially if applied with wisdom and in close
cooperation with the ultimate beneficiaries. Total global spending on
military forces and armaments is now close to one thousand billion
dollars a year. That is about a hundred times the total spent on all
forms of non-military aid to poor countries. Put another way, to
alleviate hunger and poverty we spend just one per cent of the amount we
spend on weapons and armies.

Nuclear
weapon explosion in the atmosphere

Orphan children suffering from the double
affliction of Aids
Is this
just the opinion of a few naïve do-gooders? Listen to what President
Eisenhower said in 1953, three months after his inauguration. The
former supreme commander of the allied forces in Europe stated :
“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired,
signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not
fed, those who are cold and not clothed. … The cost of one modern heavy
bomber is this : a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is
two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It
is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. … We pay for a single fighter
plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single
destroyer with new homes that could have housed 8,000 people.”
Dr Alexander Irvine, [Dr
Irvine was the author of the book referred to in the chapter on Ireland,
My Lady of the Chimney Corner.]
the respected Irish educator, Bowery evangelist, and union organiser in
America, was a YMCA Padre and Chief Morale Officer of the Allied Armies
in the first world war. He wrote of his wartime experience on the Somme
: “I used to look over towards Amiens every morning to see if the
cathedral was still standing. One day I went over to the city. It was
deserted, save for a few straggling citizens and some military
policemen. Just beyond cavalry horses were clattering over the cobble
stones as they passed on their way to the front. Emotions of awe,
desolation, and reverence passed through my mind in quick succession.
Incongruous world ! sons of God, blowing each other to shreds. Two
thousand years of teaching thrown to the winds, a denial of God and
rejection of love”.

Modern
soldiers equipped for action
Is it
possible to alter in a fundamental and radical way, the political
morality and economic priorities of our powerful western governments?
Are such changes possible, or more possible under governments of
particular politics or philosophies? They are certainly much less
likely under totalitarian regimes. But whether a government is
socialist or conservative, - I doubt makes much difference. The root
problem is the evil that infects human hearts regardless of politics. I
firmly believe with Solzhenitsyn and Tolstoy, that good or evil are not
confined within particular nations or ethnic group, governments or
organizations, - each is contaminated to some degree, and each has the
potential for change. Can it happen? We see possibilities when we look
at the past and present condition of states like South Africa, Cambodia,
Chile and Germany, to name but a few. They may be far from perfect, but
they have sought cleansing and renounced past evil.
Haiti is a
modern example of a failed state which has just about every problem that
one can imagine, - poverty, corruption, injustice, unemployment, and
human misery to an appalling degree. It is the kind of country one
despairs of. What is there that could possibly be done to change
things? Yet even there there are numerous Christian groups, charities,
NGOs and UN projects attempting against impossible odds to turn the tide
of degradation and misery, to heal, to feed, to educate, and to provide
jobs. Dr Tony Campolo and his Beyond Borders organization
has set up schools for ‘slave’ children who otherwise would never get an
education. (My home town helped to establish one). Even in that pitiful
land, there is some hope.

Dr Tony
Campolo whose organization Beyond Borders is giving education to
the most disadvantaged children in Haiti. Dr Campolo with some of his
‘slave’ school children.
We all need redemption.
And we all need an ultimate moral and spiritual standard that transcends
human fallibility. That redemption, and that standard, I believe we
have been given in Jesus Christ. Archbishop Desmond Tutu describes
those eternal values, and the reality of redemption in a fallen world
thus in his inimitable way: [I have re-arranged the material slightly as
it is taken from a campus speech delivered largely without notes.]
“this is
God’s world, and God is (ultimately) in charge. In the darkest moments
of our struggle we sought to uphold the morale of our people. We sought
to keep the light of hope burning by telling … the perpetrators of
injustice, however powerful they may be, ‘(you) have already lost’. The
upholders of apartheid never in their wildest dreams imagined they would
ever lose power. None of these dictators ever think this. They think
that God is a kind of accident that happens to somebody else, never to
themselves, and they strutted the world stage like cocks of the walk
supported by a conniving cannibal west. Those who upheld apartheid
never thought that this is a moral universe, and because it is a moral
universe, right and wrong matter. … injustice can never have the last
word. … (Yet) when we looked at the state of the world we sometimes
wondered whether God had any plan at all.
And then
apartheid collapsed, and freedom arose as a phoenix from the ashes. An
elderly man emerged with dignity from 27 years of prison and hard labour
with no bitterness, resentment or anger towards his jailors. In fact he
invited one to be a VIP guest at his Presidential inauguration. And in
our time haven’t we seen the Berlin wall collapse? And haven’t we seen
a small little woman dispense compassion and caring and love for
derelicts in Calcutta?
(But) even
the worst dictator will never say, ‘I violate human rights’. None of
them ever say that. Not those in Burma or anywhere else. Why? (No
one) stands up and declares ‘I am a child molester’, or, ‘I am an
abuser of women’. Why? Why are you appalled when awful things happen?
Why are you appalled when you see children starving, or refugees running
from oppression? It is because (in our hearts we know) that evil is
not the norm. Injustice is not the norm. Poverty is not the norm.
War is not the norm. These are aberrations. God chose us in Christ to
be God’s children, before the foundation of the world. God gives up on
no one. (He has) made this world for goodness, love, laughter, joy,
compassion, peace, caring, gentleness. We must help realize the dream.”
Redemption,
by its definition, has to be effective in changing the worst and most
unlikely of individuals as well as the worst of societies or regimes. A
remarkable example of personal redemption and transformation of a hate
figure, is seen in the life of George Wallace, the former
pro-segregation, anti-civil rights Governor of Alabama. Elected in 1962
on a slogan of “Segregation now! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation
forever!”, Wallace went on to block the enrollment of African
American students at the University of Alabama. He had vowed to
“refuse to abide by any federal court order even to the point of
standing in the schoolhouse door”. Martin Luther King said in 1963
that Wallace was “perhaps the most dangerous racist in America
today”. Wallace closed Birmingham schools that year rather than
allow them to be integrated. He told the New York Times :
“What this country needs is a few first class funerals,
and some political funerals too”.
In 1972
while campaigning for the Democratic nomination for President, Wallace
was shot by a deranged white man, Arthur Bremer. The attack left
Wallace crippled for the rest of his life, but he continued to serve as
Governor from a wheelchair till 1978. During a long term in hospital
this former white supremacist and hatemonger became a devout Christian
and renounced his earlier racist attitudes. He apologized to the
victims of his previous actions and policies. In 1982 he told a black
audience, “We thought it was in the best
interest of all concerned. We were mistaken”.
He ran
again for the governorship of Alabama, this time on a platform of racial
and religious tolerance. The black electorate was convinced the change
was genuine, and many of them voted for him, electing him to an
unprecedented fourth term. Ill-health forced Wallace into retirement in
1987 but he continued to support integration and attended a re-enactment
of the Selma-Montgomery march in 1995. In his final years, he was
nursed and attended day and night by a negro man who he called the best
friend he had on earth. Black civil rights leaders including the Rev
Jesse Jackson, mourned for their former enemy George Wallace at his
death in September 1998.

Governor
George Wallace as a young fierce opponent of civil rights and George
Wallace before he died, totally changed in attitude to other races.
Solzhenitsyn records his own personal awakening to spiritual truth
during the Gulag experience : “It was granted
to me to carry away from my prison years on my bent back, which nearly
broke beneath its load, this essential experience : how a human being
becomes evil and how good. In the intoxication of youthful successes I
had felt myself to be infallible, and I was therefore cruel. In the
surfeit of power I was a murderer and an oppressor. In my most evil
moments I was convinced that I was doing good, and I was well supplied
with systematic arguments. It was only when I lay there on rotting
prison straw that I sensed within myself the first stirrings of good. I
came to realize that the line separating good and evil does not run
between states, or classes or political parties, - but right through
every human heart, and through all human hearts. Even within hearts
overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained; and even
in the best of hearts, there remains a small corner of evil.”
In 2002 Professor and
Pastor, Eugene Peterson completed and published a remarkable paraphrase
of the Bible in contemporary language [The
Message, the Bible in Contemporary Language, Eugene Petersen, Nav
Press, 1993].
The Message is a most readable and challenging work incorporating
vivid modern idiom and accurate scholarship. In his Introduction to
the Message, Peterson comments on the contrast between the cruelty
and confusion of our world, and the message of redemption in the Bible:
“ … the
biblical world is decidedly not an ideal world, the kind we see
advertised in travel posters. Suffering and injustice and ugliness are
not purged from the world in which God works and loves and saves.
Nothing is glossed over. God works patiently and deeply, but often in
hidden ways, in the mess of our humanity and history. Ours is not a
dream world in which everything works out according to our adolescent
expectations. There is mystery everywhere. There is pain and poverty
and abuse. For most of us it takes years and years to exchange our
dream world for the real world of grace and mercy, sacrifice and love,
freedom and joy, - the God-saved world.”

Bulgarian youths at a centre for victims of
child trafficking

Ambulance
in Lebanon targeted by shrapnel and gunfire
Consider
another prominent American, and one whose actions I have sometimes
criticised, along with the behaviour of members of his family, - George
W H Bush, the current President’s father. In an interview with Larry
King, at the age of 82, he expressed his deep misgivings and personal
revulsion at war and military action, in the face of the horrendous
casualties caused. He declined to comment on his own record since he
could do little to alter the past, but as he looked forward to death, he
summed up his own hopes and expectations in the phrase – ”Our
God is a forgiving God”.
As we seek to make sense
of the moral and spiritual dilemmas facing us in the 21st
century, and to find a way forward that will give a degree of security
and permanence to human life on this planet, the words of Oliver Wendell
Holmes [That is, Oliver Wendell Holmes, senior, (1819 – 1891), as
opposed to his equally renowned son of the same name who became a Chief
Justice of the United States Supreme Court. OWH junior lived from 1841
to 1935.] remain very pertinent. More than any other poet, perhaps, he
described with prophetic insight, the way all of us and our societies
applaud the courage of past reformers and leaders, but remain blind to
the moral issues of our day and fail to stand up for them in the crises
of our time. This reflects Jesus’ condemnation of the religious leaders
of his time who built memorial tombs of the prophets but who persecuted
the genuine prophets of their own time. Holmes claimed that we praise,
“a legendary virtue carved upon our fathers’ graves”. But we
go on to “make their truth our falsehood” because “we see
dimly in the present what is small and what is great”. Wendell
Holmes wrote in the context of the struggle to abolish slavery in
America, but claimed that our refusal to address all injustice
eventually returns to haunt us, and may exact a terrible price from
future generations. “They enslave their children’s children who make
compromise with sin”. (Actually, I hesitated to include quotations
from the poem because it has occasionally been used to justify the very
attitudes it condemns).
Today, in
the name of all our hard-fought-for freedoms and liberties, our
governments are dismantling those freedoms and imposing despotic
controls that permit jail without charge or trial, torture (or the use
of information gained by torture), and deportation; and they sometimes implement a
‘shoot-to-kill’ policy on our streets. While claiming to stand for
transparency and freedom of information, our governments have become
more secretive than ever. In the name of national security,
administrations seek to protect politicians from exposure of their
lies. The deaths of countless innocents at the receiving end of our own
weapons of death and destruction, are treated as an irrelevance, - mere
collateral damage.

Limbless
victims of land mines
For a final
piece of inspiration, I would like to quote from the Nobel Peace Prize
address of Martin Luther King in 1964:
|
On accepting
the Nobel Peace Prize, 1964

Martin Luther King
I accept this award today with an abiding
faith in America and an audacious faith in the future of
mankind. I refuse to accept despair as the final response to
the ambiguities of history. I refuse to accept the idea
that the "is-ness" of man's present nature makes him morally
incapable of reaching up for the eternal "ought-ness" that
forever confronts him.
I refuse to accept the idea that man is
mere flotsam and jetsam in the river of life, unable to
influence the unfolding events which surround him.
I refuse to accept the view that mankind
is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism
and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood
can never become a reality. I refuse to accept the cynical
notion that nation after nation must spiral down a
militaristic stairway into the hell of nuclear annihilation.
I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will
have the final word in reality. This is why right,
temporarily defeated, is stronger than evil triumphant.
I believe that even amid today's mortar
bursts and whining bullets, there is still hope for a
brighter tomorrow. I believe that wounded justice, lying
prostrate on the blood-flowing streets of our nations, can
be lifted from this dust of shame to reign supreme among the
children of men. I have the audacity to believe that peoples
everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies,
education and culture for their minds, and dignity,
equality, and freedom for their spirits. I believe that what
self-centered men have torn down, men other-centered can
build up. I still believe that one day mankind will bow
before the altars of God and be crowned triumphant over war
and bloodshed and nonviolent redemptive goodwill proclaimed
the rule of the land. And the lion and the lamb shall lie
down together, and every man shall sit under his own vine
and fig tree, and none shall be afraid.
I still
believe that we shall overcome.
Martin Luther King |
Well, these
are some of my reflections on life and on a beautiful but troubled
world. They are a few of the images captured during my lifetime.
Images captured in time, become reflections from eternity, if we have a
spiritual sensitivity to the messages from beyond outer space. And in
the end, our lives are but a prelude to eternity. Malcolm Muggeridge
used to reminisce that his life as a writer and newspaperman could be
summed up by the image of a blank sheet of paper in a typewriter. For
me, since the day I first packed a canvas bag and headed down to the
harbour to join my father’s fishing boat, life has been a series of
packed and unpacked suitcases. On fishing boats and research vessels,
in tents and shacks, in umpteen hotels, guest houses, apartments and
pensiones, in cities and towns and rural areas in over 70 countries, I
have gone through the ritual of packing and unpacking time and time
again. Each time it happens, I remind myself that one day I shall pack
up and leave for the last time in this earth, and I shall make a one-way
trip to another world, - to a far more beautiful and more permanent
land.
The
prospect for me grows more and more appealing as that day approaches. I
have no wish to “rage, rage, against the dying of the light”. I
want to leave this world with gratitude in my heart for the privilege of
sharing in its wonder and its joys as well as its tragedies and
heartaches. After all, as Max Ehrmann expressed it so poignantly in
Desiderata, “with all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is
still a beautiful world”. I share the sentiments of Robert Louis
Stevenson, “gladly I live, and gladly die, - so
lay me down with a will”.
So I want
to depart with a spring in my step and a light in my eye in anticipation
of the eternal realm. Someone once asked a learned man if he knew what
lay beyond the door of death. He replied that he did not. Just then
there was a scratching at the door of the office. He opened it to find
that his dog had gotten out of the garden and somehow followed the scent
to his place of work that day. The animal bounded in and jumped up to
its master in a show of enthusiastic canine affection. The man then
turned to the one who had asked the question about death. “My dog
did not know what lay behind that door just now. But he knew who was
behind the door, and for him, that was all that mattered.” It is
more than enough for me also, to know the One who waits for me, just
beyond the door out of time into eternity.
 |