Some Troubles Betwixt
Sutherland and Caithness in 1612
The year of God, 1612, there happened some discord and
dissensions betwixt Sutherland and Caithness, which troubled a little the peace of that
part of the Kingdom. The occasion was this:- One Arthur Smith (a false coiner), being,
together with his servant, apprehended for making and striking of false money, were both
sent to Edinburgh, the year of God, 1612. His Majesty gave a secret commission to his
servant, Sir Robert Gordon (the Earl of Sutherland's brother), for apprehending this
Arthur Smith; but, as Sir Robert was going about to perform the same, he received a
commandment from His Majesty to accompany Sir Alexander Hay (then Secretary of Scotland)
in apprehending John Lesley of New Lesley, and some other rebels in Gereagh; which Sir
Robert obeyed, and committed the execution of the commission against Arthur Smith unto his
nephew, Donald Mackay of Farr, John Gordon of Gospeter, younger (nephew to George Gordon,
slain at Marle, the year 1587), and to John Gordon, son to John Gordon of Backies.
These three, parting from Sutherland with 36 men, came to the
town of Thurso in Caithness, where Arthur Smith then dwelt, and there apprehended him;
which, when John Sinclair of Skirkag (the Earl of Caithness's nephew) understood, he
assembled the inhabitants of the town, and opposed himself to the King's commission. There
ensued a sharp skirmish upon the streets of Thurso, where John Sinclair of Skirkag was
slain, and James Sinclair of Dun left there, deadly hurt, lying upon the ground; Arthur
Smith was there likewise slain; divers of the Sutherland men were hurt; but, perceiving
Smith dead, they left Thurso, and retired themselves all home into their own country.
Thereupon, both the parties compeared before the Secret
Council at Edinburgh. The Earl of Caithness did pursue Sir Robert Gordon, Donald Mackay
and John Gordon for the slaughter of his nephew. These, again, did pursue the inhabitant
of Caithness for resisting the King's commissioners. The Secret Council (having special
commandment from His Majesty to that effect) dealt earnestly with both the parties; and,
in end, persuaded them to submit these questions and debates to the arbitriment of
friends.
A certain number of the Lords of Council were chosen as
friends for either party. The Archbishop of St. Andrews and the Earl of Dunfermline,
Chancellor of Scotland, were appointed oversmen by consent of both parties. These friendly
judges, having heard the business reasoned in their presence, and, finding that the
examination thereof would prove tedious and intricate, they direct a power to Marquis of
Huntly to deal in the matter; desiring him to try, if, by his means and mediation, these
contentions might be settled, happening betwixt parties so strictly tied to him by blood
and alliance, the Earl of Sutherland being his cousin-germain, and the Earl of Caithness
having married his sister.
The Marquis of Huntly did his best, but could not prevail,
either party being being so far from condescending to the other's demands, and so he
remitted the business back again to the Secret Council; which Sir Robert Gordon
perceiving, he moved the King's Majesty for a pardon to Donald Mackay, John Gordon, and
their associates, for the slaughter of John Sinclair of Skirkag; which His Majesty
earnestly granted, seeing it was committed in the execution of His Majesty's service; yet,
nevertheless, there still remained a grudge in the minds of the parties, searching by all
means and occasions to infest one another, until the year of God, 1619, that the Earl of
Caithness and Sir Robert Gordon (then, by his brother's death, Tutor of Sutherland) were
reconciled by the mediation of George Lord Gordon, Earl of Enzie, by whose travel and
diligence all particulars betwixt the Houses of Sutherland and Caithness were finally
settled; and then went both of them familiarly to either's houses; whose perfect
reconciliation will, doubtless, tend to the peace and quiet of these parts of the kingdom.
|
