Search just our sites by using our customised search engine

Unique Cottages | Electric Scotland's Classified Directory
 

Click here to get a Printer Friendly PageSmiley

Stirling


The Stirling's first appear as owners of land in the twelfth century. After possessing land in different counties, they acquired, in the reign of William the Lion, the estate of Cawder, which has continued in the family, without interruption through the 20th century  -- a period of nearly 8 centuries. Few families can boast of an inheritance which has descended through so long a line of ancestors.

The Stirlings of Fairburn are acknowledged by the Lord Lyon in a matriculation of Arms to be direct descendants of Clan MacGregor that took the name Stirling, when they were under the protection of the Stirling family, as an alias during the proscription on their name and kept the name Stirling when the proscription was lifted.

After continuing for ten generations in the direct male line, the Cawder estate, in the sixteenth century, descended to an heiress, who married her kinsman, Sir James Stirling of Keir; and thus the Cawder and Keir families became united; the two estates have ever since been held by the same proprietor.

Keir was first acquired by the Stirling family in the year 1448. Lukas Stirling, who had previously possessed lands in Fife and Strathern, purchased Keir from George Leslie of that ilk, ancestor of the Earls of Rothes. Sir William, the grandson, got Keir erected into a barony by King James III, who afterwards burned the tower. Sir William had been accused of being a party to the assassination of James III, at the battle of Sauchieburn, but without sufficient evidence.

Sir John, the fourth Laird of Keir, added greatly to the family estates between the years 1517 and 1535. He took a prominent part in the public events of the time, and held office of the Sheriff of Perth in 1516. After the death of James IV at Floden, the custody of the young King's person was committed to him. He was forfeited for appearing at the battle of Linlithgow against the King's authority in 1526, but was restored in the following year. He founded a chaplainry in the Cathedral church of Dunblane in 1509.

His son, Sir James, was the husband of the heiress of Cawder. He divorced his wife, but retained her estate, and thus added considerably to the wealth of the family. He was appointed by King James IV, to be one of the judges who tried Morton for the murder of Stewart of Darnley, and pronounced the sentence of death on the regent.

Sir George Stirling, great grandson of Sir James, was intimately connected with his kinsman, the first Marquis of Montrose, and was prosecuted in 1641, by the Committee of Estates, as one of the 'Plotters'. Sir George was with Montrose at the rout of Philiphaugh, the only occasion on which this quiet knight was found associated in arms with his great cavalier chief. After the death of Sir George without surviving issue, the estates of Keir and Cawder were inherited by his cousin Sir Archibald Stirling, Lord Garden, a Lord of Session of some distinction in the reign of Charles II.

James Stirling, grandson of Lord Garden, was a keen Jacobite, and was tried for an alleged conspiracy in favour of the Stuart family in 1708, but acquitted. James Stirling was forfeited in 1715, and deprived of his estates, which were afterward acquired by friends, and restored to his son, from who they have descended to the present representative of the family.

In the course of the long descent of the Keir and Cawder families, there have been no less than fourteen knights, ten of whom were in immediate succession to each other. The honour of knighthood, though personal, has thus the appearance of having been hereditary for many generations in the Keir family. Several branches of the family, such as Ardoch, Glorat, and others, attained hereditary rank of Baronet for special services; but the representatives of the main line have remained untitled, as they began, barons of Cawder and Keir.

Our thanks to Rick Stirling for providing us with this history.


I think there are some errors regarding Janet Stirling. Her father Andrews died with her as a minor and John Stirling of Kier snapped her up as a guardian. However he had nefarious reasons for doing so. He wanted the land she as the last heiress stood to inherit Ochiltree Castle and vast lands in Cadder (I do not know the difference between Cadder and Cadder). Regardless he Marie her off to his eldest son. Whom she divorced after falling in love with Thomas Bishop. He had grown up in Edinburgh and was educated beyond most of the many , likely most of the aristocrats of the time. I am not trying to make Thomas into a hero but at times he spied for Scotland and at other times he spied for England. He was awarded Pocklington ( my information says in 1544) by King Henry VII . Henry liked Thomas for several reasons but the gift of Pocklington was for his good work in the battle of Dunbarton. It was Thomas who stayed and fought, not his superior.


Regarding the marriage to Janet Stirling, he made a deal with old man John Stirling tgat he and Janet would give up the lands in Cadder but were to keep Ochiltree Castle. They lived there for a time I cannot give in certainly. However Thomas was acting as bodyguard to some Scottish aristocrat when they were confronted by a man named Johnston. Thomas killed him with his sword. And was expelled from Scotland as a murderer. Janet had some sort of relationship (it has been called Cousin, but I cannot independently verify that) but regardless she petitioned Queen Mary for permission to move to England to be with Thomas.

Thomas was involved with Henry VIII and his problem of not having a male heir. He was given the task of finding a husband for Mary Tudor, it never worked out and of course we got “Bloody Mary” who remained a Roman Catholic and she put many to death, then we get Elizabeth I and by that time Thomas was working for Lord Lennox as secretary and deal maker. He had a long feud with Lady Lennox who was Henry’s niece, and. a Protestant. Ultimately leading to what the English call “The Northern Rebellion" instigated by Lennox and cronies. Both Thomas the Elder and Thomas the younger were captured and dragged back to England Thomas the elder was put in the tower, however Thomas the younger was hanged, beheaded and quartered by Elizabeth in 1570. His head can be seen on the front of a Pub in Yorkshire. There were many in the northern part of England who remained Roman Catholics.

Thomas and Janet had additional offspring who remained in Pocklington for about 100 years, but they were not wealthy and eventually sold Pocklington a family named Dolman.

I have truncated this considerably, but the Stirlings of Kier were essentially crooks or rather opportunists. There is a book that explains their treachery and the falsehood in the self published book “The Stirlings of Kier". I have the book somewhere, but the title alone is long enough to be a book.

Dave Bishop not of the Scottish line of Bishops, but rather a line tbat came with William the Conquerer or shortly thereafter. The last I can find lived in Dorset in 1080. The line gets confused with the Scottish line because the given names are quite the same ( sir knight James, sir knight William) and many others with tge same given names in Scotland.

David E. Bishop
Winder, Georgia USA.


  Back


 


This comment system requires you to be logged in through either a Disqus account or an account you already have with Google, X, Facebook or Yahoo. In the event you don't have an account with any of these companies then you can create an account with Disqus. All comments are moderated so they won't display until the moderator has approved your comment.

comments powered by Disqus

Quantcast